![]() ![]() > Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit > > alert, or the script can even restart the milter. > monitor the clamav milter so if it ever dies again I get an email > Now to my question :) Does anyone have a script or know how I can > (clamav): local socket name /var/run/clamav/clamav-milter.sock > this caused the clamav milter to die which is not a huge > out when updating (My fault - a firewall rule problem) For some > I found a problem on one of our clamav servers - freshclam kept > but in the mean time is anyone else experiencing and similiar I'll go through the logs and see if I can get some more details, > connect to the update site and for some reason it looks like it never > It happened again last night - for some reason the freshclam could ![]() ![]() > Thanks - I'll give those programs a try out. Mrz 2007 um 10:21 schrieb Matthias Häker: It would not connect to any of the 12 sites tried.ĬlamAV update process started at Thu Mar 29 16:22:01 2007ĭatabase updated (104152 signatures) from (IP:Īnd ClamXav reports Error 52 "web problem. Nonblock_connect: connect(): fd=6 errno=22: Invalid argument Main.cvd is up to date (version: 42, sigs: 83951, f-level: 10,Ĭonnect_error: getsockopt(SO_ERROR): fd=6 error=61: Connection refusedĬan't connect to port 80 of host (IP: SECURITY WARNING: NO SUPPORT FOR DIGITAL SIGNATURES Very annoying.Subject: Re: Notification when clamav milter dies? Which is really a pity, since there's really not that much decent mac security software on the market, most is garbage really. It's so unprofessional, it makes me very skeptical about this "security" software.Īnd it's not the 1st time, I found things like this also informed the developer about things now and then, but I'm afraid it's not going to be of much use (never got any feedback). If you deactivate one of those, of course the software doesn't work correctly anymore. if I find them after half a year or so? I know my mac quite well, therefore I was able to find out - but the average user can't. How am I supposed to know, which programs these background activities are belonging to, esp. What's worse, they still look strange / suspicious in the "Background processes" section of the system prefs: there's exactly these 2 entries "Mark Allan" and "open" (the last one even states: "Item from an unidentified developer"). I mean what the heck is "Mark Allan", or "open" supposed to mean, why should I allow this? It's confusing for end users and simply bad GUI design (not optimized in any way for macOS Ventura, and this is after several months of the final release). For example when it installs, it shows strange notifications. I think this is true only for badly programmed AV-software, well programmed AV software should offer these features, leave it to users to deactivate them - and perform good anyhow.īut worse: it's partly rather buggy. I'd say, there's really plenty, not to say too much room for improvement options like behavioral / network protection - of course this wouldn't be for everyone, I know all these mac users who state: it's useless and only slows down my mac. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |